ArticleSexually transmitted infections2025
Developing and validating a Bayesian clinical risk prediction model for three sexually transmitted infections in key populations from two Canadian provinces.
Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAcross Canada, in the last decade, incidence rates of sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBI) have peaked (syphilis) or plateaued (hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV). Key populations (gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, trans and gender-diverse people, and people who use injection drugs) are at greater risk for these STBBIs, so correctly predicting risk before screening potentially infected individuals is crucial. We developed and validated a diagnostic clinical risk prediction model (CRPM) estimating HIV, HCV and syphilis risk for two key populations in two Canadian provinces.
methodsWe used 20 variables and STBBI test results from a cross-sectional study evaluating multiplexed testing (detection of coinfections) in New Brunswick and Quebec (n=400) to develop our CRPM. We randomly split the data into development (n=300) and validation (n=100) datasets using clinic-stratified sampling. We used Bayesian predictive projection with development data to select ranked STBBI predictors. We obtained the ORs of the highest performing submodel measured as area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity with 89% credible intervals (89% CrI) using validation data. Analyses were performed in R (≥V.4.2.3).
resultsOut of 400 participants, 73 were infected with HIV (n=16), HCV (n=60), and/or syphilis (n=5). An internally validated submodel with two predictors (
conclusionsThis Bayesian-based CRPM is the first to identify high-risk individuals for HIV, HCV and syphilis with an overall good performance that minimises case missing. After additional validation, it could serve as a promising novel tool for prescreening key populations and improve Canadian STBBI multiplexed screening strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.