ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2025
Prognostic Value of Compact Myocardial Thinning in Patients With Left Ventricular Noncompaction.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking Left Ventricular Noncompaction and Excessive Left Ventricular Trabeculation: Development, Genetics, and a Proposed Conceptual Framework.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging predictors of outcomes in noncompaction cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Left ventricular non-compaction in heart failure: contemporary perspective on diagnostic challenges and treatment opportunities.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Hypercortisolism with coronary nonobstructive myocardial infarction and left ventricular noncompaction: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical presentations of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) range from asymptomatic cases to ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT), heart failure (HF), and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). In this multicenter study, we explored the associations between clinical and imaging characteristics and outcomes of LVNC patients and validated the predictive value of myocardial thinning identified on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as previously described. About 214 adult patients (54% male, mean age 41 ± 16 years) meeting the imaging criteria for LVNC were identified. Myocardial thinning was defined as a 50% or greater diameter reduction of the compacted myocardium compared to a contiguous segment on CMR. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or heart transplant, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), CVA/transient ischemic attacks (TIA), VT and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Focal myocardial thinning was observed in 42 patients (20%). Over a median follow-up time of 7 years (IQR, 4 to 10 years), 54 patients (24%) experienced a primary outcome. Patients with myocardial thinning had more cumulative adverse events than those without myocardial thinning (chi-square = 29.516, log-rank < 0.001), even after matching for medical risk score. In a multivariate Cox regression model, myocardial thinning remained associated with outcomes: HR 3.052 (95% CI: 1.569 to 5.937, p = 0.001). Myocardial thinning is associated with adverse cardiovascular events in LVNC patients. Incorporating myocardial thinning into medical risk assessments can improve the prediction and management of adverse outcomes in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.