Observational studyClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025
LBP and iFABP mismatch in the evaluation of intestinal barrier dysfunction due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Observational study in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal multi-omic dynamics in hospitalized COVID-19 patients based on disease severity.Gut microbes reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 presents a hyperinflammatory scenario due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome with intense cytokine release, with consequent extrapulmonary involvement in 20 % of patients. The authors studied whether COVID-19 intestinal damage is a direct action of the virus on intestinal epithelial cells, with damage mainly at the tight junction. This is a retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital emergency department. The authors studied 87 patients (46 patients over 61 years and 41 patients under 60 years old) with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. The authors measured two plasma markers, LPS-Binding Protein (LBP) and ileal Fatty Acid-Binding Protein (iFABP). Furthermore, the authors evaluated the interaction between the two markers. TNF-α and IL-1 β were higher in bacterial co-infected patients and TNF-α was also higher in the older patients. Plasma iFABP levels were not statistically different in patients with bacterial co-infection; however, higher levels were found in the older population. Plasma LBP levels were higher in patients with bacterial co-infection when compared to patients without infection; however, when comparing plasma LBP levels in the older population with younger patients, no differences could be found. LBP, FABP, and cytokines can discriminate between bacterially infected patients and also discriminate elderly patients. The present study suggests that intestinal barrier dysfunction in SARS-CoV-2 infections is mainly due to damage to the intestinal tight junction complex with a disproportionately lower damage to enterocyte. In the older population, the authors also observed an increase in intestinal epithelial damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.