ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Cardiac Self-Efficacy Improvement in a Digital Heart Health Program: Secondary Analysis From a Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lifestyle modification programs play a critical role in preventing and managing cardiovascular disease (CVD). A key aim of many programs is improving patients' self-efficacy. In-person lifestyle modification programs can enhance self-efficacy in managing CVD risk, also known as cardiac self-efficacy (CSE). However, such programs are typically staffing and resource intensive. Digital lifestyle modification programs may offer a scalable and accessible way to improve CSE, but this has not been shown in prior research. Objective: This study examined changes in CSE among individuals using a digital lifestyle modification program for cardiovascular health. Evaluation of improvement in CSE was a secondary goal of a feasibility and acceptability pilot study of a digital program for Heart Health. Methods: Participants were individuals with elevated risk for CVD who enrolled in a 90-day pilot study that involved mobile app-based, artificial intelligence-powered health coaching and educational lessons focused on behaviors that promote cardiovascular health. Participants completed the 9-item CSE Scale at baseline and in month 2. Changes in confidence in participants' ability to manage their cardiovascular health were assessed. Results: The sample included 273 (n=207, 61.2% female; mean age 59.3, SD 10.1 years) participants who submitted a complete CSE Scale at baseline and in month 2. The total CSE Scale score increased by 12.9% (P<.001) from baseline to month 2. Additionally, there were significant increases in mean score on each of the 9 individual CSE Scale items (all P<.001), with the largest increases in confidence "in knowing when to call or visit the doctor for your heart disease" (17% increase; P<.001), "in knowing how much physical activity is good for you" (16.3% increase; P<.001), and "that you can get regular aerobic exercise" (19% increase; P<.001). Conclusions: The present analyses indicate that participants in a digital lifestyle modification program for cardiovascular health showed significant improvements in CSE within 2 months. This work adds to the growing literature examining ways to improve health-related self-efficacy and scalable access to programs for prevention and management of CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.