ArticlePloS one2025
Optimized CUT&RUN protocol for activated primary mouse B cells.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ChIP-seq has long been the standard for study of chromatin-protein interactions. However, development of a new technique, CUT&RUN, showed substantial advantages compared to ChIP-seq including higher quality signal while using substantially less sample. While a powerful technique, the original protocol was designed using cell lines and histones as targets. Due to their fragility, this was unsuitable for obtaining high-quality data from activated primary B lymphocytes. To adapt this protocol for B cells, cells were fixed prior to nuclear isolation, and several critical adjustments were introduced to the procedure and reagents. We measured binding of H3K4me3 histone and RNA Polymerase II, detecting robust peaks with as little as 100k nuclei. Additionally, freeze-thaw of B cells prior to processing did not affect results, emphasizing the flexibility of this modified technique. Using the protocol described here will allow one to quantify non-histone proteins bound to DNA from limited numbers of B cells with more efficiency than can be achieved from the current standard, ChIP-seq.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.