ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2025
[Self-report of body silhouettes to discriminate high abdominal adiposity in adolescents].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obtaining abdominal adiposity through self-reporting of body silhouettes could be a tool in long-distance epidemiological studies. Objective: To determine the cut-off point of body silhouettes and evaluate their diagnostic certainty in the classification of abdominal adiposity in Mexican adolescents. Material and methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was carried out on adolescents aged 14 to 18, high school students in the State of Mexico. The participants signed the informed consent, a body silhouette (BS) scheme was applied and their waist circumference (WC) was measured at the abdominal midpoint. Descriptive analyzes were performed, the best cut-off point was determined using ROC curves and the Youden index, and the diagnostic performance of BS to identify abdominal adiposity was evaluated. Results: 513 students were included (57% female; median age 16 [IQR 15-17] years). BS 6 was found to be the best cut-off point for both women (Youden = 0.68) and men (Youden = 0.69). The sensitivity was 91% in women and 79% in men, the specificity was 77% in women and 89% in men, with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.92 (95%CI = 3.77, 4.08) for women and 7.08 ( 95%CI = 4.55, 11.0) for men. Conclusions: Self-reported BS are a tool with high certainty that can be used to discriminate abdominal adiposity in adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.