Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2025
[Cesarean section risk assessment for pregnant women at term].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Every year, approximately 140 million births occur, with the majority being spontaneous deliveries in women without risk factors, resulting in vaginal births of healthy newborns. Objective: To develop a prognostic score to predict the probability of cesarean section in pregnant women at term with a single live fetus presenting with initial labor at hospital admission. Material and methods: Through a case-control study, pregnant women at term with initial labor at hospital admission were included. Cases were women with labor that culminated in an emergency cesarean section and controls were women who had a normal vaginal delivery. Clinical history was questioned, and a complete physical examination was performed. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: Seventy women were included, 27 cases and 43 controls. There were differences between groups in maternal weight, obesity, primiparity, uterine activity, history of premature rupture of membranes (PROM), cervical dilatation and effacement (p < 0.05). Factors associated with the risk of cesarean delivery were maternal obesity, primiparity, PROM, dilatation < 6 cm, and effacement < 50% (OR ≥ 3.3). Score ≥ 3.5 on the proposed scale is associated with the risk of cesarean delivery with a sensitivity of 81.5% and a specificity of 79%. Conclusion: Factors associated with the risk of cesarean delivery are maternal obesity, primiparity, and PROM. Score >4 points on the proposed scale is associated with the risk of cesarean delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.