ReviewBlood advances2025
2025 ASH ISTH NBDF WFH monitoring report on the 2021 clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease.
Review in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost comparison of pdVWF/FVIII prophylaxis and on-demand therapy in type 3 von Willebrand disease in the United States.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Allele-selective disruption of pathogenic VWF variants in type 2 von Willebrand disease using CRISPR/Cas9.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Treatment of von Willebrand disease.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Von Willebrand disease: more than just a bleeding disorder.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Utilisation and Perceived Value of Genetic Counsellors Within US Haemophilia Treatment Centres.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe American Society of Hematology (ASH), International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF; now National Bleeding Disorders Foundation), and World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease (VWD) included 11 recommendations on the diagnosis of VWD and 12 recommendations on the management of VWD, the most common inherited bleeding disorder. We describe the results of a review of the 2021 guidelines by the clinical co-chairs of the guideline panels requested by ASH to inform decision-making about the need for and timing of a guideline revision. An updated MEDLINE and Embase search applied the same terms as the ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines limited to studies from 2020 to 30 July 2024 (diagnosis) or 24 July 2024 (management). For the diagnosis of VWD, 432 studies were identified and underwent title and abstract review, with 17 undergoing full text review, and for the management of VWD, 288 studies were identified and underwent title and abstract review, with 37 undergoing full text review, to determine whether the data would change the strength or directionality of the existing recommendation or merit development of a new recommendation. Based on this review, the clinical co-chairs noted that none of the reviewed studies would change the direction or strength of the existing guideline recommendations. There will be continued monitoring of the ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis and management of VWD to evaluate whether there is sufficient new evidence to warrant additional revisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.