ArticleBlood advances2025
An ethical allocation scheme for scarce gene therapies in sickle cell disease and transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Update of the decision-making algorithm on selecting transfusion-dependent β-thalassemic patients for gene therapy approaches: joint consensus report on behalf of EHA-specialized working group and EBMT hemoglobinopathies working party.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Article
- The Journey of Gene Therapy in Sickle Cell Disease: How Molecular Advances Meet Clinical Care.Cells · 2026Review
- Rules, risks, and reality: rethinking gene therapy eligibility.Blood advances · 2026Article
- CRISPR and Fanzor in sickle cell disease: current progress and future prospects.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Gene Therapy of Beta Hemoglobinopathies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Reality bites: allocating gene therapy for hemoglobinopathies.Blood advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractNovel gene therapies (GTs) for sickle cell disease (SCD) and transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) are severely limited by manufacturing, intensive care delivery, and high costs, requiring an ethically justified framework for allocating treatment within GT programs. Using an Accountability for Reasonableness process, we worked with a multidisciplinary committee to develop our program's initial GT allocation framework. This defines the population eligible for GT among patients with SCD and TDT, balancing inclusivity and safety. Among those eligible, prioritization is based on the following: (1) disease prevalence-based proportionality; (2) those who may not be eligible for GT in the future ("sickest first" due to impending organ failure); (3) those without an allogeneic donor; and (4) lottery. Transparent, adaptable frameworks are crucial for just GT allocation. Collaboration across programs is essential for equitable access and mitigating gamesmanship. Although this single-center framework cannot address systemic inequities, we hope our transparent process serves as a model for other programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.