Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40273277›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Research-informed decision-making for empowering integrated care system development: Co-creating innovative solutions to facilitate enhanced service provision.

Eren Demir, Usame Yakutcan, Stephen Page

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eren DemirHertfordshire Business School, University of Hertfordshire,, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9087-7169
Usame YakutcanHertfordshire Business School, University of Hertfordshire,, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Stephen PageHertfordshire Business School, University of Hertfordshire,, Hatfield, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated care has emerged as a vital approach to addressing complex health and social care challenges through attempting to foster collaborative provision in healthcare settings. Yet as demand for services often outstrips supply, hospitals, as anchor institutions in communities, are constantly seeking to innovate to align their resources with needs and policy priorities. As hospitals are often viewed as a conduit for creating and embracing innovation to enhance organisational performance, this paper outlines one such innovation, which was co-created as a partnership between a university and hospital to help it with its transition to an integrated care system (ICS). By developing a full hospital system model in partnership not only with hospital stakeholders but also out-of-hospital services - such as community and primary care - for an integrated care model, this study helps to translate an innovative model into practice at an ICS level. To achieve this, decision support tools (DSTs) were used to foster evidence-based assessment of the hospital system, and key opinion leaders (KOLs) were provided with a versatile toolset with which to optimise workforce productivity and deployment, innovate service provision, and enhance community health.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHumans

Identifiers

PMID40273277
PMCPMC12021209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.