ArticlePloS one2025
Research on mechanical automatic food packaging defect detection model based on improved YOLOv5 algorithm.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive texture and low-light feature learning in enhanced MobileNetV4 for industrial packaging quality inspection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Thermal imaging for sealing defect detection in pharmaceutical bags using a temporal fusion network.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Quality Control in the Food Industry: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid development of industrial automation, traditional manual detection methods are inefficient and error-prone, which cannot meet the needs of modern production for high efficiency and high precision. Therefore, it is particularly important to develop a mechanical automatic inspection system that can automatically identify food packaging defects. In this study, aiming at the limitations of existing technologies in identifying small targets and subtle defects, an enhanced YOLOv5-based model for detecting food packaging flaws is introduced. Firstly, we integrated a Convolutional Attention module (CBAM) to enhance the model's attention on crucial image features. This mechanism prioritizes significant features by weighting the feature map in channel and spatial dimensions, which improves accuracy in detecting minor defects and small objects. Secondly, feature fusion across scales is achieved with pyramid and aggregation networks, so that the model can capture defects of different sizes at the same time, which enhances the recognition ability of diverse defects in food packaging. In addition, this study also optimizes the backbone network structure of YOLOv5. By integrating the streamlined YOLOv5s model and adding an Adaptive Spatial Feature Fusion module (ASFF), the model's ability to blend features from different scales was enhanced. In this study, 7400 images with 512×512 resolutions were applied to develop the proposed model. The experimental results show that the improved model outperforms the original YOLOv5 model in terms of Accuracy (Ac), Recall (Re), and F1 score, with values of 0.96, 0.94, and 0.94, respectively, effectively improving the automation and accuracy of food packaging defect detection when compared with YOLOv5+ASFF (Ac=0.94, Re=0.95, and F1=0.94), original YOLOv5 (Ac=0.82, Re=0.85, and F1=0.88), and YOLOv5+CBAM (Ac=0.88, Re=0.9, and F1=0.89). Additionally, the present performance of an improved YOLOv5 model (CBAM+Fusion Pyramid Network (FPN)+Path Aggregation network (PANet)+ASFF) was significantly comparable to the related research works.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.