ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Do community-level factors play a role in HIV self-testing uptake, linkage to services and HIV-related outcomes? A mixed methods study of community-led HIV self-testing in rural Zimbabwe.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A process evaluation of community-led distribution of HIV self-testing kits in rural communities in Zimbabwe.Health policy and planning · 2026Trial
- Do community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led HIV testing intervention. Secondary analysis of an HIV self-testing intervention in rural communities in Zimbabwe.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-led interventions, where communities plan and lead implementation, are increasingly being adopted within public health programmes. We explore factors associated with successful community-led distribution of HIV self-test (HIVST) kits to guide future service delivery. Twenty rural communities were supported to distribute HIVST kits for 1-month between January and September 2019. Social science researchers observed communities during planning and HIVST distribution, documenting findings in a standard observation template. Three months post-intervention, a population-based survey measured self-reported new HIV diagnosis, HIVST uptake, linkage to post-test services; and collected blood samples for viral load testing. The survey also included questions related to community cohesion; respondents' communities were grouped into low/medium/high based on community cohesion scores. We used mixed effect logistic regression to assess how outcomes differed based on community cohesion scores. In total, 27,812 kits were distributed by 348 distributors. Two HIVST distribution models were implemented: door-to-door only or at community venues/events. Of 5,683 participants surveyed, 1,831 (32.2%) received kits and 1,229 (67.1%) reported self-testing; overall HIVST uptake was 1,229/5,683 (21.6%). New HIV diagnosis increased with community cohesion, from 32/1,770 (1.8%) in the low-cohesion group to 40/1,871 (2.1%) in the medium-cohesion group, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.94 (1.41-6.12, p = 0.004) and 66/2,042 (3.2%) in the high-cohesion group, aOR 7.20 (2.31-22.50, p = 0.001). Other outcomes did not differ by extent of cohesion. Our findings demonstrate the more cohesive communities are, the more effective they may be at distributing HIVST kits and identifying people with undiagnosed HIV. Efforts to increase community cohesion should be considered as part of public health programmes and for planning and scaling-up HIVST implementation in communities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.