Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40273210›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

A systematic narrative review of the research evidence of the impact of intersectionality on service engagement and help-seeking across different groups of women, trans women, and non-binary individuals experiencing homelessness and housing exclusion.

Carolin Hess, Zahra Abdulla, Lydia Finzel, Antonina Semkina, Jess Harris, Annette Boaz, Jill Manthorpe

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in sociology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carolin HessPolicy Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9256-6786
Zahra AbdullaInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lydia FinzelResource Economics Group, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Antonina SemkinaPolicy Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jess HarrisPolicy Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Annette BoazPolicy Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jill ManthorpePolicy Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with experience of homelessness face severe health inequalities, with their average age at death being nearly half that of the general population. Recent research emphasises the compound challenges women with homeless experiences face in seeking help,accessing and engaging with support services, but we know little about the influence of different intersectional dimensions on their support access and experiences. The paper aims to review the evidence and critically engage with the impact of gender/sex, race, ethnicity, age, disability, class/poverty, migration status, religion, pregnancy/maternity and sexual orientation on women's homelessness trajectories and engagement with services.

methodsWe conducted a systematic narrative review of studies in 2023 investigating the impact of intersectional dimensions on women, trans women, and non-binary individuals with experiences of homelessness' engagement with services and help-seeking. Primary qualitative, quantitative or mixed method research, written in English and published after 2010, was included. Narrative methods were utilised in the synthesis and analysis of the research.

resultsThe search identified 4109 articles after deduplication from which 52 were included for review. The findings highlighted intersectional experiences in help-seeking and engagement across housing, healthcare, the police, social services, and voluntary organisations. The women, trans women and non-binary individuals included in the studies reported a range of barriers, stigma, and discrimination, often rooted in systematic and intersectional disadvantage which delayed or prevented help-seeking and recovery.

conclusionThe review investigates the multiple challenges faced by women, trans women and non-binary individuals with experiences of homelessness, highlighting systemic and intersectional disadvantages which impinge on their agency. Changes in policy and practice are recommended to develop more effective person-centred, culturally and gender-sensitive approaches that can transform intersectional dimensions into strengths, empowering women and improving their recovery and engagement with services.

Indexed as

Help-Seeking BehaviorHousingIll-Housed PersonsPatient Acceptance of Health CareFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumans

Identifiers

PMID40273210
PMCPMC12021236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.