ArticlePloS one2025
Intelligent recognition of human activities using deep learning techniques.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MAGNet: enhancing action recognition with multimodal fusion and adaptive graph convolution.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Human Activity Recognition in Domestic Settings Based on Optical Techniques and Ensemble Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A spatiotemporal deep learning framework for detecting unusual human activity in surveillance videos.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recognition of Human Actions (HAR) Portrays a crucial significance in various applications due to its ability for analyzing behaviour of humans within videos. This research investigates HAR in Red, Green, and Blue, or RGB videos using frameworks for deep learning. The model's ensemble method integrates the forecasts from two models, 3D-AlexNet-RF and InceptionV3 Google-Net, to improve accuracy in recognizing human activities. Each model independently predicts the activity, and the ensembles method merges these predictions, often using voting or averaging, to produce a more accurate and reliable final classification. This approach leverages the advantages of each design, leading to enhanced performance recognition for activities. The performance of our ensemble framework is evaluated on our contesting HMDB51 dataset, known for its diverse human actions. Training the Inflated-3D (I3D) video classifiers using HMDB51 dataset, our system aims to improve patient care, enhance security, surveillances, Interaction between Humans and Computers, or HCI, and advance human-robot interaction. The ensemble model achieves exceptional results in every class, with an astounding aggregate accuracy of 99.54% accuracy, 97.94% precision, 97.94% recall, 99.56% specificity, 97.88% F1-Score, 95.43% IoU,97. 36% MCC and Cohen's Kappa 97.17%. These findings suggest that the ensemble model is highly effective & a powerful tool for HAR tasks. Multi-tiered ensembles boost wearable recognition, setting a new gold standard for healthcare, surveillance, and robotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.