Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40273193›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Intelligent recognition of human activities using deep learning techniques.

Shazab Bashir, Arfan Jaffar, Muhammad Rashid, Sheeraz Akram, Sohail Masood Bhatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shazab BashirFaculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, The Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0007-6834-807X
Arfan JaffarFaculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, The Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad RashidDepartment of Computer Science, National University of Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0008-2796-4594
Sheeraz AkramInformation Systems Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sohail Masood BhattiFaculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, The Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognition of Human Actions (HAR) Portrays a crucial significance in various applications due to its ability for analyzing behaviour of humans within videos. This research investigates HAR in Red, Green, and Blue, or RGB videos using frameworks for deep learning. The model's ensemble method integrates the forecasts from two models, 3D-AlexNet-RF and InceptionV3 Google-Net, to improve accuracy in recognizing human activities. Each model independently predicts the activity, and the ensembles method merges these predictions, often using voting or averaging, to produce a more accurate and reliable final classification. This approach leverages the advantages of each design, leading to enhanced performance recognition for activities. The performance of our ensemble framework is evaluated on our contesting HMDB51 dataset, known for its diverse human actions. Training the Inflated-3D (I3D) video classifiers using HMDB51 dataset, our system aims to improve patient care, enhance security, surveillances, Interaction between Humans and Computers, or HCI, and advance human-robot interaction. The ensemble model achieves exceptional results in every class, with an astounding aggregate accuracy of 99.54% accuracy, 97.94% precision, 97.94% recall, 99.56% specificity, 97.88% F1-Score, 95.43% IoU,97. 36% MCC and Cohen's Kappa 97.17%. These findings suggest that the ensemble model is highly effective & a powerful tool for HAR tasks. Multi-tiered ensembles boost wearable recognition, setting a new gold standard for healthcare, surveillance, and robotics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHuman ActivitiesPattern Recognition, AutomatedAlgorithmsHumansVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID40273193
PMCPMC12021237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.