SynthesisPloS one2025
Maternal complication of instrumental vaginal delivery and its associated factors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical predictors of postpartum vaginal and vulvar hematomas and the need for surgical treatment.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Forceps-Assisted Delivery Could Reduce the Iatrogenic Fistula Crisis: A Clinical Commentary.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile instrumental vaginal delivery is generally a safe procedure, but it is associated with significant risks for both the mother and the newborn in developing countries. However, burden of maternal instrumental delivery complications and its predictors in Ethiopia is highly varied and there isn't data that indicate nation-level cumulative evidence. Therefore, this study aimed to assess pooled prevalence of maternal complication related to instrumental vaginal delivery and its associated factors among mothers who underwent instrumental vaginal delivery in Ethiopia.
methodsIn this study, we conducted a search on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, HINARI, and Google Scholar academic databases for studies published until August 2024. Keywords such as instrumental delivery, forceps, vacuum, complication, factors and Ethiopia were used to access literatures from the databases. For quality assessment and data extraction, The Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tools and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized. Random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled prevalence of maternal complication of instrumental vaginal delivery. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to explore potential heterogeneity. The publication bias was assessed using Funnel plot and Egger's.
resultsA total of 12 studies with 3745 study participants were participated in the present meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of maternal complication of instrumental vaginal delivery was 21% (95% CI, 15.0%-28.0%). The prevalence of maternal complication was significantly different among studies conducted between ([2015-2020), and those conducted between [2020 and 2024]. Lowest (14%) in studies conducted before 2020 and highest (26%) among studies conducted 2020 and after (P-value<0.001). Type of instrument (AOR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.37-2.90), episiotomy status (AOR: 3.49, 95% CI: 2.12-5.76), birthweight (AOR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.88-4.97) and parity (AOR = 2.96, 95%CI: 1.80-4.85) were the factors associated with maternal complication of instrumental vaginal delivery.
conclusionOur study shows that approximately one in five mothers who underwent instrumental vaginal delivery develop serious maternal complication. Type of the instrument, episiotomy status, birthweight and parity were important predictors of the maternal complication of instrumental vaginal delivery. Effective evaluation of indication, contra indication and precondition for each instrument helps to prevent the maternal complication of instrumental vaginal delivery.
trial registrationRegistered in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022366360.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.