ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Experiences and effect of implementing social health insurance (SHI) program in Nepal-A mixed method study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating end-of-life conversations: A reflection on goals of care in Nepal.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nepal initiated the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP) in 2016, but enrollment rates remain low, with an increasing dropout rate. This study examined the experience of service providers and beneficiaries with NHIP and its effect on insurance enrollment and health service utilization.We employed an exploratory sequential mixed-method design, involving 14 focus group discussions and 20 key informant interviews, supplemented by quantitative data from Nepal's District Health Information System (DHIS-2). We identified a complex interconnection between demand- and supply-side factors affecting enrollment, renewal, and health-seeking behavior within NHIP. Both NHIP enrollees and non-enrollees cited the quality of health services as crucial for enrollment. Other significant factors included inadequate awareness, insurance scheme design (service lag time, referral requirements), limited geographical accessibility to health facilities, ability to pay premiums, perceived illness risk, and the perceived usefulness of health insurance. Service providers reported that NHIP implementation increased patient flow and administrative burden without proportional resource growth. They faced challenges such as a lack of motivation, claim and reimbursement difficulties, tedious medicine procurement, and insufficient information about the insurance program. Our quantitative analysis confirmed increased patient flow and referrals due to the policy's effect. In intervention districts, there was an increase in the average number of total client visits, new client visits, and referrals by 4,729, 2,721, and 163 respectively, compared to comparator districts. These increases occurred when the enrollment rate was at 5%.Our findings highlight the dependency of NHIP enrollment on the quality of the healthcare delivery system. To improve NHIP effectiveness, there should be increased awareness and insurance literacy, enhanced insurance scheme design features, and improved geographical accessibility to health facilities. Efforts should also focus on resource availability, expanding the qualified health workforce, and improving stewardship and accountability mechanisms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.