Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40273143›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Core collection construction and genetic diversity analysis of tea plant (Camellia sinensis [L:] O. Kuntze) accessions in Huangshan city using SSR markers.

Xu Ruan, Qiong Wu, Xiaoyu Jiao, Dandan Liu, Minghui Sun, Leigang Wang, Wenjie Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xu RuanTea Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID 0009-0005-2130-7882
Qiong WuTea Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xiaoyu JiaoTea Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Dandan LiuTea Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Minghui SunTea Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Leigang WangTea Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Wenjie WangTea Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID 0009-0005-5576-642X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing genetic diversity and building a core collection is essential to advancing tea plant breeding. In this study, ten SSR markers exhibiting robust amplification and polymorphism were employed to genotype 292 tea accessions sourced from various regions in Huangshan city. The results revealed significant genetic variation, encompassing 180 alleles. Genetic structure was evaluated using neighbor-joining clustering, principal coordinate analysis, and Structure analyses, which categorized the tea accessions into two primary clusters. The genetic diversity within these clusters demonstrated high similarity, likely due to their close geographical proximity. A core collection was established utilizing Core Hunter software, resulting in the selection of 35% of the accessions to effectively represent the genetic diversity of the entire collection. This core collection comprises 102 tea accessions, preserving a high percentage of allele richness and genetic diversity. This research offers valuable insights into genomics research and the sustainable management of tea plant genetic resources in Huangshan city.

Indexed as

Camellia sinensisGenetic VariationMicrosatellite RepeatsAllelesChinaGenotypePhylogenyPolymorphism, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID40273143
PMCPMC12021250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.