ArticlePloS one2025
Bedside clinical prediction tool for mortality in critically ill children.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMortality rates among critically ill pediatric patients remain a persistent challenge. It is imperative to identify patients at higher risk to effectively allocate appropriate resources. Our study aimed to develop a prediction score based on clinical parameters and hemogram to predict pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) mortality.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study to develop a clinical prediction score using data from children aged 1 month to 18 years admitted for at least 24 hours to the PICU at Chiang Mai University between January 2018 and December 2022. PICU mortality was defined as death within 28 days of admission. The score was developed using multivariable logistic regression and assessed for calibration and discrimination.
resultsThere were 29 deaths in 330 children (8.8%). Our model for predicting 28-day ICU mortality uses four key predictors: male gender, use of vasoactive drugs, red blood cell distribution width (RDW) ≥15.9%, and platelet distribution width (PDW), categorized as follows: <10% (0 points), 10-14.9% (2 points), and ≥15% (4 points). Scores range from 0 to 8, with a cutoff value of 5 to differentiate low-risk (<5) from high-risk (≥5) groups. The tool demonstrates excellent performance with an AuROC curve of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91, p<0.001) showing excellent discrimination and calibration, 82.8% sensitivity, and 73.1% specificity, respectively.
conclusionsThe score, developed from clinical data and hemogram, demonstrated potential in predicting ICU mortality among critically ill children. However, further studies are necessary to externally validate the score before it can be confidentially implemented in clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.