ArticlePloS one2025
Determinants of successful driving rehabilitation training in licensed individuals with disabilities.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Collaborative Occupational Therapy-Instructor Model for Driving Evaluation of Persons with Disabilities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have provided that self-driving can enhance the mobility of people with disabilities and their quality of life. The National Rehabilitation Center has been providing driving rehabilitation education for people with disabilities since 1994, as part of a welfare service project aimed at guaranteeing their right to free movement. However, there is no analysis of the status and results of driving rehabilitation education and evaluations in South Korea, and research on these programs is lacking. This study aims to analyze the on-road driving rehabilitation education and evaluation results conducted by the National Rehabilitation Center from 2019 to 2021. It seeks to identify the characteristics of the prior license holders with disabilities and the factors influencing the need for additional driving rehabilitation education. Out of a total of 676 prior license holders, 532 were included in the analysis regarding the need for additional driving rehabilitation education. The results of this study indicate that women were 2.07 times more likely than men to require additional driving rehabilitation education. Conversely, the likelihood of requiring additional driving rehabilitation education was lower for those with better driving senses (0.17 times), less tension (0.46 times), and less impact from their disability (0.45 times). For prior license holders, it was found that demographic characteristics (excluding gender) or the nature of their disabilities had less significant impacts compared to the driver's response level, the type of driving license held, and the number of assistive devices used. These findings can be used for developing effective driving education programs for people with disabilities and designing strategies to enhance license acquisition rates, thereby improving their mobility rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.