Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40273115›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Gender and cultural aspects of brucellosis transmission and management in Nakasongola cattle corridor in Uganda.

Christine Tricia Kulabako, Stella Neema, Lesley Rose Ninsiima, Jörn Klein, Lydia Namakula Nabawanuka, James Muleme, Javier Sánchez Romano, Peter Atekyereza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christine Tricia KulabakoDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0009-0007-7190-1649
Stella NeemaDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Lesley Rose NinsiimaDepartment of Biosecurity, Ecosystems and Veterinary Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-3771-0527
Jörn KleinUniversity of South Eastern Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1803-4167
Lydia Namakula NabawanukaDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-3900-7504
James MulemeDepartment of Biosecurity, Ecosystems and Veterinary Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Javier Sánchez RomanoDepartment of Medical Biology, The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8305-7947
Peter AtekyerezaDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrucellosis is a zoonotic disease with significant public health and economic effects on societies. In Uganda, brucellosis is endemic and a primary contributor in livestock productivity losses. This is more worrisome for populations in the cattle corridor with high reliance on cattle and milk for nutritional value and symbol in social relations and identity. The community's social construction may affect comprehension of brucellosis hence leading to exposure and increased vulnerability to transmission. Despite brucellosis' high prevalence in the cattle corridor, little attention has been paid to its social construction. Hence, this study explored the interplay between gender dynamics, vulnerability and social construction of brucellosis transmission, in consideration of the unique socio-cultural context that characterizes cattle corridor populations.

methodsUsing an exploratory qualitative approach, the study was conducted in Nakasongola cattle corridor within three sub counties; Nabiswera, Nakitoma and Wabinyonyi using key informant interviews (KIIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs). Purposive sampling was used to identify participants for the four FGD [8-12] each from a subcounty though one was combined and 15 KIIs. Data were collected using face -to -face interviews with an interview guide that was structured using the Socio Ecological Model of Human Behaviour framework (SEMHB) constructs. Thematic analysis was conducted in NVivo 12 Pro incorporating both deductive (guided by the SEMHB) and inductive approaches (guided by the data).

findingsThe study identified important themes under each SEMHB influence level (Individual, Interpersonal, Community and Societal level). The study indicates that social composition and role distribution are driven by social and cultural expectations and significantly contribute to exposure and vulnerability to infection in the cattle corridor. For instance, it is paramount that women undergoing marriage preparations to be fed on raw milk for a certain period prior to their ceremony to enhance beauty. Also, important to note that use of personal protection to assist births is viewed by the community as opposing cultural norms, creating a perception of detachment from the highly valued cattle. Another noteworthy finding is the level of knowledge on brucellosis in terms of symptoms, transmission route, prevention and treatment at the interpersonal level. Furthermore, findings show practices such as the consumption of raw milk and assisted births, as being rooted in the social cultural norms, hence critical for transmission of brucellosis. At the community and organizational levels, the findings indicate an inadequate level of knowledge sharing and reluctance towards preventive measures as structural factors for the transmission of brucellosis and are ingrained in family and power relations.

conclusionThe findings highlight that the social construction of brucellosis transmission is rooted in gender roles, social- cultural and power structures highlighting the influence of living process and spaces, at the different societal levels. Such complex dynamics play a critical role in determining individuals' susceptibility to infection as well as transmission potential of the disease-causing agent in cattle keeping communities. The gendered induced vulnerabilities related to the socio-cultural norms and familial roles, also play an important role in the exposure and spill over at the individual, interpersonal and community levels. The insufficient knowledge-sharing and reluctance to adopt preventive measures emerge as structural contributors to the persistence of brucellosis and other emerging zoonoses. These factors, intertwined with family dynamics and power relations, call for targeted interventions that address both individual behaviors and broader socio-cultural and institutional barriers to effective disease management and prevention. Conversely, policies that align with the community's social construction, gender and context are more likely to be feasible, adopted and sustained by the affected population.

Indexed as

BrucellosisAdolescentAdultAnimalsCattleCultureFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsUgandaYoung AdultZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID40273115
PMCPMC12021251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.