Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40273090›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Patient-centered perspectives: A qualitative evaluation of the Hip Instructional Prehabilitation Program for Enhanced Recovery (HIPPER).

Aditya Dhariwal, Somayyeh Mohammadi, Ethan Simpson, Marie D Westby, Wendy Watson, William C Miller

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02969512 (Feasibility of the Hip Instructional Prehabilitation Program for Enhanced Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02969512 nacompletednot on this map

Feasibility of the Hip Instructional Prehabilitation Program for Enhanced Recovery (HIPPER) Intervention Protocol: An eHealth Approach for Pre-surgical Hip Replacement Education

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled51ConditionsHip OsteoarthritisArmsHIPPER, OASIS Online Educational Webinars
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aditya DhariwalDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Somayyeh MohammadiDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ethan SimpsonDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Marie D WestbyCentre for Aging SMART, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Wendy WatsonVancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
William C MillerDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3060-0210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 55,000 total hip replacement (THR) surgeries were performed in Canada in 2021, with the number rising each year. Excluding rehabilitation, the cost of hip replacement procedures exceeded $675 million, a large burden on the Canadian healthcare system. Considering this large financial impact, prehabilitation delivered through electronic health (eHealth) can improve post-surgical outcomes and reduce overall healthcare expenditures by enhancing recovery and reducing hospital length of stay. This study utilized grounded theory to examine user experience of the Hip Instructional Prehabilitation Program for Enhanced Recovery (HIPPER), an eHealth approach to prehabilitation education. Participants were purposively sampled and conventional content analysis was conducted on 18 transcribed semi-structured interviews with participants who completed the HIPPER program in preparation for THR surgery. We identified three categories and seven subcategories: 1) 'That wasn't so hard!', with the subcategories easy to use, learning information and appreciating HIPPER, which describe how participants were able to learn information and use the modules easily; 2) 'I'm ready', comprising of the subcategories being prepared for surgery and having a smooth and good experience which relates to how participants were prepared and confident going into surgery; 3) 'I'd like to have seen', including the subcategories having differing experiences and suggesting additions, which explore participants' constructive criticism and ideas for improvement. Our results show useful features to include in eHealth programs and demonstrate how educational prehabilitation in the form of eHealth is helpful and usable for older adults undergoing THR. We also discuss and inform the integration of feedback and development of eHealth programs for elective surgical procedures. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on November 21, 2016 with the registration number NCT02969512.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipPatient Education as TopicAdultAgedCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative ExerciseQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID40273090
PMCPMC12021138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.