Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40273059›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Exploring the antimicrobial and antibiofilm potency of four essential oils against selected human pathogens using in vitro and in silico approaches.

Kamal A Qureshi, Adil Parvez, Humaira Ismatullah, Hanan Almahasheer, Osamah Al Rugaie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kamal A QureshiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3498-797X
Adil ParvezNextGen Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India.
Humaira IsmatullahSchool of Interdisciplinary Engineering & Sciences (SINES), National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hanan AlmahasheerDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU), Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7696-7707
Osamah Al RugaieDepartment of Biology and Immunology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-drug-resistant (MDR) pathogens pose a significant global health challenge, underscoring the urgent need for novel antimicrobial agents with minimal toxicity to humans. This study investigated the in vitro and in silico antimicrobial and antibiofilm potentials of four essential oils (EOs): clove bud oil (CBO; Syzygium aromaticum L.), black seed oil (BSO; Nigella sativa L.), cinnamon bark oil (CNBO; Cinnamomum zeylanicum), and citronella oil (CTLO; Cymbopogon nardus L.), against 19 selected human pathogens, including MDR strains. Among the tested EOs, CBO, BSO, and CNBO exhibited the highest antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis, with the mean zone of inhibition diameters (ZIDs) of 20.0 ±  0.2 mm, 46.0 ±  0.3 mm, and 32.0 ±  0.1 mm, respectively, at a concentration of 10 µL/disc, while CTLO displayed no antibacterial activity. CNBO demonstrated superior antifungal activity, with the mean ZIDs of 49.0 ±  0.3 mm and 36.0 ±  0.3 mm for Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger, respectively. Molecular docking analyses revealed robust interactions of key bioactive compounds-eugenol (EU) from CBO, thymoquinone (TQ) from BSO, cinnamaldehyde (CN) from CNBO, citronellal (CIT) and linalool (LIN) from CTLO-with microbial target proteins, substantiating their antimicrobial and antibiofilm potential. Notably, CTLO, despite limited in vitro activity, exhibited unique binding interactions in silico, suggesting potential niche applications. These findings underscore the translational potential of EOs as alternative antimicrobial therapies against MDR infections, particularly biofilm-associated infections, and highlight the need for further in vivo studies to validate their efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBiofilmsOils, VolatileAnti-Bacterial AgentsCandida albicansCinnamomum zeylanicumComputer SimulationCymbopogonHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Docking SimulationPlant OilsStaphylococcus epidermidisSyzygiumAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsOils, VolatilePlant Oils

Identifiers

PMID40273059
PMCPMC12083874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.