ArticlePloS one2025
Understanding social work's role in abortion care: A comprehensive scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial workers have played a crucial role in abortion care for decades, addressing clients' diverse abortion care needs. Social workers have ethical duties to provide unimpeded access to information and supports to clients, in pursuit of social justice. This scoping review comprehensively synthesizes published literature on social work's role in abortion care.
methodsThe review adhered to Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework. The following databases were searched for literature published between 1973-2023: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Social Work Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, and Scopus. Search results were uploaded to Covidence for de-duplication and screening. Out of 2,980 articles screened in title and abstract review, followed by full-text review, 78 articles were included.
resultsA majority the 78 studies (n = 67) were set in the United States. The remainder were from the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and two studies involved multiple countries. Six themes emerged to summarize the literature base: (1) Social workers' attitudes regarding abortion and abortion-seekers; (2) Abortion stigma and barriers in social work; (3) Social work and reproductive justice; (4) Social work and ethical considerations regarding abortion; (5) Social work and abortion policy and advocacy; and (6) Social work and family planning: roles, approaches, and practice frameworks. DISCUSSION: Social workers have long played intrinsic roles in abortion care, including counseling, providing access to concrete supports and mitigating barriers to abortion care, and abortion rights advocacy. Social justice and professional ethical commitments underpin social work's role in abortion care. However, existing gaps in abortion education, training, and practice frameworks are impeded by the dynamic legal landscape and stigma attached to people seeking abortion care. Reproductive justice offers a framework, that overlaps with the field's social justice tenets, to raise consciousness among social work students, professionals, and researchers, and to address gaps in abortion education, training, and scholarship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.