ArticleEndocrine-related cancer2025
In vivo and in vitro analysis of functional effects of the SDHD H50R variant.
Article in Endocrine-related cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Germline mutations in the four genes (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC and SDHD) encoding the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) holoenzyme are known to predispose towards the development of tumor including pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas (PPGLs), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), clear cell renal cancers (RCC) and possibly others. Mutations in these genes have also been described in patients with Cowden syndrome, which includes tumors of the breast, brain and thyroid gland. Although nonsense mutations are clearly pathogenic, the functional consequences of many missense mutations are unclear. It has previously been reported that the missense mutations SDHDG12S and SDHDH50R predispose to thyroid and breast cancers, although this characterization has been disputed. To address this question, we developed mouse models to test tumorigenicity of these variants. The reference mouse genome codes for a serine at residue 12 in Sdhd, so this variant was not pursued further. To assess the role of SDHDH50R (H50R), we generated a knock-in mouse allele for this variant and studied its effects in vivo as well as in vitro in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Unlike null alleles for Sdhd, the H50R allele did not produce embryonic lethality when homozygous. There was no statistically significant difference in survival or tumor formation in homozygous or heterozygous animals compared to littermate controls. In vitro studies similarly failed to detect significant differences in proliferation, colony formation or metabolic function. Based on our analysis of this allele's function both in vivo and in vitro, we conclude that the SDHDH50R allele is most likely a non-pathogenic polymorphism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.