Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40272851›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2025

Stronger Drought Response of CO

Valentin Heinzelmann, Julia Marinissen, Rien Aerts, J Hans C Cornelissen, Stef Bokhorst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valentin HeinzelmannAmsterdam Institute for Life and Environment, Section Systems Ecology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-6630-4571
Julia MarinissenAmsterdam Institute for Life and Environment, Section Systems Ecology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rien AertsAmsterdam Institute for Life and Environment, Section Systems Ecology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Hans C CornelissenAmsterdam Institute for Life and Environment, Section Systems Ecology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2346-1585
Stef BokhorstAmsterdam Institute for Life and Environment, Section Systems Ecology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 847504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought events are increasing in frequency and intensity due to climate change, causing lasting impacts on plant communities and ecosystem functioning. In the sub-arctic, climate is changing at a rate above the global average with amplifying effects on the carbon cycle. Drought-induced shifts in the balance between productivity and respiration might have important implications for climate change feedbacks in these regions. However, little is known about how carbon fluxes in sub-arctic ecosystems respond to drought, hampering predictions. Here, we test how two important but contrasting sub-arctic ecosystem types, Sphagnum peatland and tundra heath, respond to experimental drought. Mesocosms were exposed to a full precipitation exclusion for 7 weeks, decreasing gravimetric water content by 66% and 53% for Sphagnum peatland and tundra heath, respectively. Drought suppressed all CO

Indexed as

Carbon CycleCarbon DioxideDroughtsSphagnopsidaTundraArctic RegionsClimate ChangePhotosynthesisPlant LeavesCarbon Dioxideclimate changeCO2 fluxesdroughtextreme eventspeatlandplant responsessub‐arctic ecosystems

Identifiers

PMID40272851
PMCPMC12020989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.