ArticleGlobal change biology2025
Sustainable Land Use Enhances Soil Microbial Respiration Responses to Experimental Heat Stress.
Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Uncovering the Role of Land Use Intensity in Shaping Forest and Grassland-Specific Soil Fungal Communities.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil microbial communities provide numerous ecosystem functions, such as nutrient cycling, decomposition, and carbon storage. However, global change, including land-use and climate changes, affects soil microbial communities and activity. As extreme weather events (e.g., heatwaves) tend to increase in magnitude and frequency, we investigated the effects of heat stress on the activity (e.g., respiration) of soil microbial communities that had experienced four different long-term land-use intensity treatments (ranging from extensive grassland and intensive grassland to organic and conventional croplands) and two climate conditions (ambient vs. predicted future climate). We hypothesized that both intensive land use and future climate conditions would reduce soil microbial respiration (H1) and that experimental heat stress would increase microbial respiration (H2). However, this increase would be less pronounced in soils with a long-term history of high-intensity land use and future climate conditions (H3), and soils with a higher fungal-to-bacterial ratio would show a more moderate response to warming (H4). Our study showed that soil microbial respiration was reduced under high land-use intensity (i.e., -43% between extensive grassland and conventional cropland) and future climate conditions (-12% in comparison to the ambient climate). Moreover, heat stress increased overall microbial respiration (+17% per 1°C increase), while increasing land-use intensity reduced the strength of this response (-25% slope reduction). In addition, increasing soil microbial biomass and fungal-to-bacterial ratio under low-intensity land use (i.e., extensive grassland) enhanced the microbial respiration response to heat stress. These findings show that intensive land use and climate change may compromise the activity of soil microbial communities as well as their respiration under heatwaves. In particular, soil microbial communities under high-intensity land use and future climate are less able to respond to additional stress, such as heatwaves, potentially threatening the critical ecosystem functions driven by soil microbes and highlighting the benefits of more sustainable agricultural practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.