ArticleJAMA network open2025
Placental and Fetal In Utero Growth Among Fetuses With Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain volumes in fetuses with congenital heart disease and placental vascular abnormalities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Diminished Late Gestation Placental Volume in Fetal Heart Disease and Implications for Birth Anthropometrics.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Charting normative reference values and Z-scores for MRI-derived in vivo placental growth.Pediatric radiology · 2026Observational
- Placental hypoplasia and vascular malperfusion are associated with reduced brain volumes in fetal congenital heart disease.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Placental and Fetal Brain Volumes in Congenital Heart Disease Are Smallest Among Fetuses With Genetic Abnormalities.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Article
- Unmasking the Placenta-Heart Axis: A Comprehensive Review of Placental Abnormalities in Congenital Heart Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: At birth, neonates with congenital heart disease (CHD) have smaller placentas, lower birth weight, and smaller head circumferences compared with healthy neonates. The onset of feto-placental growth disturbances, however, is not well known. Objective: To compare fetal body volumes, assess differences in the fetal to placental volume ratios (placental growth relative to the fetus), and investigate the association between in utero fetal body and total brain volume in fetuses with and without CHD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study enrolled pregnant women with a fetal diagnosis of CHD and those with healthy pregnancies at Children's National Hospital in Washington, DC, from April 2018 to July 2023. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging was obtained up to 2 time points during pregnancy. The fetal to placental ratio was calculated using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance image fetal body volumes and placental volumes. Exposure: In utero environment CHD. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were the trajectories of body, brain, and placental volumetric growth in fetuses with CHD and in control fetuses. Generalized linear regression and mixed-effects models were applied to identify associations for fetal body volume and fetal to placental volume ratios between CHD and control groups adjusting for fetal sex and gestational age at the time of the magnetic resonance imaging scan. Results: The study included 108 fetuses (59 male [54.6%]), of which 55 were in the healthy control group (with 55 scans), and 53 had CHD (with 77 scans). Fetal body volumes in fetuses with CHD were smaller compared with control fetuses (β = -193.60 [SE, 44.42]; P < .001) with larger fetal to placental volume ratios (β = 0.23 [SE, 0.10]; P = .02). The total brain volume was smaller in fetuses with CHD compared with control fetuses (β = -10.87 [SE, 5.09]; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study of fetuses with and without CHD, those with CHD demonstrated impaired fetal body growth with higher fetal to placental volume ratios and smaller total brain volume, suggesting that placental failure was associated with growth disturbances in CHD, as demonstrated by the large fetal to placental volume ratios. Additional studies should assess the onset and progression of placental dysfunction and how the timing of placental failure may contribute to neurodevelopmental disability in survivors of CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.