Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40272763›Full record

ArticleAmbio2025

How is Gaia doing? Trends in global land degradation and improvement.

Zhanguo Bai, Jason Daniel Russ, Kentaro Florian Mayr, David Dent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhanguo BaiISRIC-World Soil Information, Box 353, 6700 AJ, Wageningen, The Netherlands. zhanguo.bai@isric.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3338-5766
Jason Daniel RussThe World Bank Group, 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC, 20433-0002, USA.
Kentaro Florian MayrThe World Bank Group, 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC, 20433-0002, USA.
David DentChestnut Tree Farm, Forncett End, Norfolk, NR161HT, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land degradation is holding back attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals and exacerbating global heating. Land degradation and improvement since 1981 have been assessed by proxy using remotely sensed Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), translated into net primary productivity. The quantitative data show the extent and trends of changes over four decades and identify where further action is needed. During 1981-2021, 28.5% of land was degrading-most notably through megafires in boreal forests, land clearance and cultivation in sub-Saharan Africa and the East Indies and across the steppes. The degraded area increased by 4.5% compared to 1981-2003 yet affected fewer people-1.2 billion compared to 1.5 billion. Consistent policies on sustainability increased biological productivity on 26% of land (10.5% more than 1981-2003), particularly cropland in China, India and the European Union; 2.9 billion people now live in the improved areas compared with 0.8 billion in the improving areas of 1981-2003.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesSustainable DevelopmentCarbon captureLand degradation & improvementNDVINPPSustainability

Identifiers

PMID40272763
PMCPMC12480325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.