ArticleGeroScience2025
Longitudinal changes in blood-borne geroscience biomarkers: results from a population-based study.
Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploratory Effects of a Novel Nutraceutical on Senescence-Related Protein Biomarkers in Healthy Adults: A Pilot Proteomics Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Trial
- Exploring the link between body physiology and cognition: the role of the brain and aging.npj aging · 2026Article
- Longitudinal analysis of cytokines, chemokines, and inflammatory markers in a middle-aged cohort.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Economic burden of stroke attributable to excess body mass in Hungary: a population-attributable fraction analysis.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The emerging role of multiomics in aging research.Epigenomics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-marker approaches are well suited for untangling the intrinsic complexity of aging and related conditions. Herein, we quantified (1) baseline concentrations of a panel of geroscience biomarkers pertaining to four biological domains (i.e., metabolism, inflammation, vascular/organ dysfunction and cellular senescence, and neurodegeneration) in individuals aged ≥60 years; (2) investigated linear and non-linear changes in biomarker levels over a 6-year period according to age and sex; and (3) described the relationships among geroscience biomarkers at baseline and follow-up. We found that repeated measures of age-dependent changes of 47 blood-borne biomarkers over 6 years had differential associations depending on the biological domains. The most relevant biomolecules in the associations between age and repeated assessments were (1) adiponectin, C-peptide, renin (metabolism), (2) CXCL10, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, MPO (inflammation), (3) cystatin C, MMP7, MMP12, VCAM-1 (vascular/organ dysfunction and cellular senescence), and (4) S100B and Tau protein (neurodegeneration). Among these molecules, a negative association with increasing age was found for IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-12p70, S100B, and Tau protein. Non-linear relationships were also identified with age for IGFBP-1, leptin, β2M, TNFRSF1B, fibrinogen, GDF-15, N-cadherin, and BDNF. Our results indicate that inflammatory and metabolic biomolecules are strongly associated with aging over 6 years of follow-up. Whether the biological pathways reflected by these biomarkers contribute to the aging process or are associated with negative health-related events needs to be explored through comprehensive multi-omics longitudinal analysis in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.