ReviewPain and therapy2025
Pain Management in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.
Review in Pain and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07259824 (Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block in Perioperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block in Perioperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A single-port robotic platform for minimally invasive cardiac surgery: system functionality and initial preclinical feasibility.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine thoracic paravertebral block for thoracoscopic atrial septal defect repair: analgesic efficacy and cardiac biomarker outcomes in a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Feasibility and postoperative analgesic profile of multimodal analgesia including combined serratus anterior plane block in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Observational
- Pectoral-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block for the Management of Resistant Chronic Post-sternotomy Pain Syndrome.Cureus · 2026Article
- Effect of serratus anterior plane block versus fentanyl for postoperative pain control and stress response after minimally invasive cardiac surgery: Randomised controlled study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Severity-Based Latent Profiles of Pain Catastrophizing and Their Cross-Sectional Associations with Fear of Pain, Sleep Quality, and Psychological Resilience in Patients Following Cardiac Surgery.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Thoracic wall fascial plane blocks: a narrative review for breast, thoracic, and cardiac surgery.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- Histology of the fascial planes: a systematic review of the microstructural foundations of regional anesthesia.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- Fascial plane blocks in the era of modern regional anesthesia: shaping the future of pain management.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
- The 7 Pillars of Pain Management for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared with conventional sternotomy, minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) is associated with significant advantages such as reduced tissue trauma, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay. However, the management of postoperative pain caused by intercostal nerve injury, pleural irritation, and tissue retraction remains a major challenge. Despite the less invasive nature of MICS, patients often report experiencing pain similar to that experienced following conventional cardiac surgery, particularly during the acute postoperative period. Effective pain management is essential for optimizing recovery, reducing the consumption of opioids, and preventing the transition to chronic postsurgical pain. Regional anesthesia techniques play a key role in multimodal analgesia for MICS. Thoracic epidural analgesia exhibits strong analgesic efficacy; nevertheless, it remains underutilized owing to concerns regarding anticoagulation-related complications and hemodynamic instability. The thoracic paravertebral block is a safer alternative that provides comparable pain relief with fewer side effects. Similarly, ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks, such as serratus anterior, parasternal intercostal, interpectoral + pectoserratus, and erector spinae plane blocks, have gained popularity owing to their safety and feasibility; however, the effectiveness of these blocks varies according to the surgical approach and type of incision. Systemic analgesia is an integral component of multimodal pain management in MICS. Despite the efficacy of opioids, a shift toward opioid-sparing strategies has been observed given the significant adverse effects associated with the use of opioids. Intravenous adjuncts such as dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can reduce opioid consumption and improve postoperative pain control. Despite advances in pain management, a single approach that can provide comprehensive analgesia for MICS remains to be established. A multimodal strategy that combines systemic and regional techniques must be developed to optimize pain management and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.