Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40272710›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

It's about location, location, location: Absolute and relative stimulus positions in action control.

Nicolas D Münster, Philip Schmalbrock, Christian Frings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolas D MünsterDepartment of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, D-54296, Trier, Germany. muenstern@uni-trier.de.
Philip SchmalbrockDepartment of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, D-54296, Trier, Germany.
Christian FringsDepartment of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, D-54296, Trier, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In action control research, stimulus features are assumed to get bound to response features and integrated into an event file. Repetition of any feature leads to retrieval of this event file, causing interference with the current action, depending on whether features repeat or change. It is known that the location of a stimulus works as a feature in these processes. Location is usually operationalized as the absolute position of the stimulus; however, the significance of a particular stimulus location is often only revealed when its position relative to other context stimuli is considered as well. In two experiments (N

Indexed as

AttentionColor PerceptionOrientationOrientation, SpatialPattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallReaction TimeYoung AdultFrame of referenceLocationS-R bindingStimulus feature

Identifiers

PMID40272710
PMCPMC12204904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.