Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40272707›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2025

Advanced radiomic prediction of osteoporosis in primary hyperparathyroidism: a machine learning-based analysis of CT images.

Antonio Adarve-Castro, Virginia Soria-Utrilla, José Miguel Castro-García, María Dolores Domínguez-Pinos, Francisco Sendra-Portero, Miguel J Ruiz-Gómez, José Algarra-García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Osteoporosis prediction using lumbar CT Hounsfield units: comparative performance and clinical implications of seven machine learning models.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antonio Adarve-CastroDepartamento de Radiología y Medicina Física, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Bulevar Louis Pasteur, 32, 29010, Málaga, Spain. elaadarve@uma.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1539-057X
Virginia Soria-UtrillaRegional University Hospital of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3285-7194
José Miguel Castro-GarcíaGeneral University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-0149
María Dolores Domínguez-PinosDepartamento de Radiología y Medicina Física, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Bulevar Louis Pasteur, 32, 29010, Málaga, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7429-4975
Francisco Sendra-PorteroDepartamento de Radiología y Medicina Física, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Bulevar Louis Pasteur, 32, 29010, Málaga, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9535-9806
Miguel J Ruiz-GómezDepartamento de Radiología y Medicina Física, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Bulevar Louis Pasteur, 32, 29010, Málaga, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4630-7588
José Algarra-GarcíaUniversity Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to assess the proficiency of supervised machine learning techniques in discriminating between normal and abnormal bone mineral density (BMD) by leveraging clinical features and texture analysis of spinal bone tissue in patients diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP). From a total of 219 patients diagnosed with PHP, the 58 who had undergone both DXA and abdominal CT scan were included in this study. BMD was assessed by quantifying the Hounsfield units (HU) and performing texture analysis on every CT scan. The first lumbar vertebral body texture features were extracted by using LifeX 7.3.0 software. Initial classification into normal or abnormal BMD was performed with different machine learning techniques by training a model with the variables obtained from the texture analysis. Differentiating osteopenia from osteoporosis was evaluated by creating two models, one including the variables obtained from the texture analysis and HU and another one which only included the HU. Their performance was evaluated in the validation and test groups by calculating the accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC. Bayes demonstrated higher performance for discerning individuals with normal and abnormal BMD, with an AUC of 0.916. The results from the second analysis showed a better performance for the model including the variables obtained from the texture analysis compared to the model that was solely trained with the HU (AUC in the training group of 0.77 vs. 0.65 in the test groups, respectively). In conclusion, analysis of BMD obtained from abdominal CT scans including texture analysis provide a better classification of normal density, osteopenia and osteoporosis in patients with PHP.

Indexed as

Hyperparathyroidism, PrimaryMachine LearningOsteoporosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedBone DensityFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesBone mineral densityHyperparathyroidismMachine learning algorithmsOsteoporosisRadiomic textures

Identifiers

PMID40272707
PMCPMC12263710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.