ArticleDermatology and therapy2025
Comparison of Dermatology Life Quality Index Scores in Adults and Adolescents with Alopecia Areata.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ritlecitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Alopecia Areata: 3-Year Results from the ALLEGRO Phase 2b/3 and ALLEGRO-LT Phase 3 Clinical Studies.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Trial
- Alopecia areata: current concepts.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Evidence Synthesis Gone Awry: The Perils of Aggregating Ineffective or Unsafe Doses in Alopecia Areata Reviews.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study assessed Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores of patients with alopecia areata (AA) and compared scores between adults and adolescents.
methodsThis was a retrospective chart review in France, Germany, Spain, and the UK. Patients with ≥ 50% scalp hair loss (SHL) due to AA and a DLQI score recorded at their index date (first date of ≥ 50% SHL) were included. The DLQI (scale 0-30; higher scores indicate greater impact) assesses the impact of AA on health-related quality of life (QOL). Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the effect of age on DLQI score, adjusting for covariates. Modified Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) between age groups and DLQI categories (none to moderate effect, very large effect, and extremely large effect), adjusting for covariates, including baseline Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score.
resultsOverall, 335 patients were included (249 adults, 86 adolescents). At index, adults had a higher mean (SD) SALT score than adolescents (63.7 [15.5] vs 60.4 [12.8]), whereas mean (SD) DLQI scores were higher in adolescents than adults (22.1 [5.3] vs 18.2 [7.5]). Most patients (84%) had DLQI scores indicating a very large or extremely large impact on their lives; this was more pronounced in adolescents than adults (98% vs 80%). In the multilinear model, adolescents had significantly higher DLQI scores than adults (β = 3.51; P < 0.001), indicating a 3.51-point increase in DLQI score associated with being an adolescent. The RR (95% CI) of a DLQI score indicating a very large effect (1.28 [1.07-1.53]) or extremely large effect (1.40 [1.21-1.61]) relative to no or moderate effect was significantly higher for adolescents vs adults.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that, at the time of experiencing ≥ 50% SHL due to AA, both adults and adolescents reported significant impacts on their QOL, with a higher impact on adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.