Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40272683›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026

Role of multimodality imaging pre-access for planning of surgical creation of arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous grafts in the chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease population.

Abdullah Khan, Daniel Raskin, Sasan Partovi, Lee Kirksey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdullah KhanDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, F30, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Daniel RaskinDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, F30, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Sasan PartoviDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Lee KirkseyDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, F30, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. kirksel@ccf.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores a range of imaging techniques used in the pre-surgical planning of vascular access, including duplex ultrasound (DUS), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), digital subtraction venography (DSV), CO2 Venography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). For each modality, we analyze its technical background, applications, advantages and disadvantages, and comparisons with alternative imaging options. DUS is the most widely used imaging modality in pre-surgical planning due to its low cost, non-invasiveness, absence of ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents, and comparable accuracy in pre-access mapping with other methods. DSA and DSV have high sensitivity and specificity to visualize the arterial and venous system and are recommended when central vascular stenosis is suspected, or a simultaneous intervention is anticipated. However, their use is limited due to exposure to contrast agents and ionizing radiation. CO2-based contrast agents provide an alternative for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients to preserve residual renal function. MRA provides a noninvasive option with no radiation exposure and superior image resolution, yet the high cost and limited availability restrict their widespread clinical use. CTA, with its short acquisition time and high-resolution imaging, is a vital modality in intricate cases. However, radiation and contrast exposure can pose challenges in this patient population. The newer IVUS modality has a superior ability to central venous outflow obstruction compared to DSA and provides more information regarding vascular geometry and anatomy. Each imaging modality has its unique advantages and disadvantages in this patient cohort. The decision to use a particular imaging must be made on a case-to-case basis. However, following KDOQI guidelines, a combination of a patient's medical history, physical examination, and DUS is a widely accepted standard practice in pre-surgical vascular access planning, with other imaging modalities reserved for selected patients.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationKidney Failure, ChronicMultimodal ImagingRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAngiography, Digital SubtractionClinical Decision-MakingComputed Tomography AngiographyHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyPhlebographyPredictive Value of TestsTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Doppler, DuplexUltrasonography, InterventionalComputed tomography angiographyDialysis accessDigital subtraction angiographyDigital subtraction venographyDuplex ultrasoundMagnetic resonance angiographyPre-access imaging

Identifiers

PMID40272683
PMCPMC12847075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.