SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Risk of Malignancy for Indeterminate Cytology of Bile Duct Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Gene Panel Analysis of Biliary Tract Cancer Using Next-Generation Sequencing of Endoscopic Transpapillary Brushing/Biopsy/Aspiration Specimens: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Two scopes, one mission: An integrated approach of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound to biliary strictures.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Robotic Whipple for Abnormal Pancreaticobiliary Junction With Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalignancy remains one of the major differentials for bile duct strictures (BDS). Endoscopic sampling of the BDS provides low and variable sensitivity, often reporting "atypical" or "suspicious" cytology results in accordance with Papanicolaou criteria. We sought to perform a systematic review investigating the risk of malignancy for initially indeterminate cytology to aid in preoperative patient counseling. PATIENTS AND
methodsA comprehensive search of databases including Scopus, EMBASE, and PubMed, was performed between each database's inception and 8 July 2024. Observational studies confirming malignancy rates in patients with atypical and/or suspicious bile duct cytology upon initial endoscopic brush cytology were included. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data. Of 4159 articles initially identified, 144 were examined in full-text review and 46 were deemed eligible for inclusion.
resultsOf 8458 total samples, 2826 (33.3%) samples had indeterminate brush cytology, consisting of either atypical (n = 1902) or suspicious (n = 924) brushings. Malignancy risk in samples with atypical and suspicious brush cytology was 50.4% and 80.2%, respectively. Suspicious cytology was associated with a relative risk of 1.59 for malignancy relative to atypical cytology. There was a 60.1% risk of malignancy among all samples with indeterminate brush cytology.
conclusionsOur study provides pooled estimates of risk of malignancy in patients with bile duct strictures and indeterminate cytology. This is one of the first meta-analyses on the topic. Our findings can be used by physicians for preoperative counseling of patients being worked up surgically for biliary strictures with indeterminate cytology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40272671What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.