ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2025
Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information Analyses of Caplacizumab for the Treatment of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura in Brazil.
Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of caplacizumab for the treatment of patients with acquired immune thrombocytopenic thrombotic purpura (iTTP) compared to standard of care from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).
methodsA decision tree followed by a Markov model with a lifetime horizon was developed. Patients entered the model with an acute iTTP event. All patients were assumed to be admitted to hospital where they either respond to treatment or die. The model offered three health states: remission, relapse or death. Input data were obtained from literature searches with the data on efficacy of caplacizumab based on the HERCULES trial. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was compared to the willingness-to-pay threshold for rare diseases of Brazilian reais (R$)120,000/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). In addition to various sensitivity analyses, a value of information (VOI) analysis was conducted.
resultsIn the base case, caplacizumab resulted in 0.70 QALYs gained, and cost R$1,333,601 more, with an ICER of R$1,901,729/QALY. The cost of the caplacizumab vial was the most influential parameter. Probabilistic analysis showed that caplacizumab was not cost effective in any iterations for the threshold of the rare disease. The expected value of perfect information per year is R$0.
conclusionAlthough caplacizumab results in incremental QALYs, based on the proposed cost, caplacizumab is not cost effective from the SUS perspective, and VOI results indicate that further research would not be worthwhile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.