ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Parent-reported experiences of in-laboratory polysomnography in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: A cross-sectional multi-centre study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Home Polysomnography in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of sleep research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard test for diagnosing certain paediatric sleep conditions. Children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) often have difficulty tolerating PSG, but parent and patient experiences of PSG for children with NDD have not been thoroughly explored. The study aim was to evaluate the parent-reported experience of in-laboratory PSG undertaken in children with NDD and to identify factors predictive of poorer experience.
methodsIn this cross-sectional multicentre study, parents of 143 children with NDD who underwent in-laboratory PSG completed a customised survey to provide feedback on parent and child worry levels, subjective tolerance and overall experience of PSG, and hypothetical preference between in-laboratory PSG versus an in-home mat-based sleep test. ANOVA, Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine participant factors associated with these outcomes.
resultsOn average, parents rated their child's worry level with respect to undergoing PSG as 'moderate,' but their own worry levels lower. Autism spectrum / neuromuscular disorder diagnoses were risk factors for both higher worry score and reporting that sleep during PSG was non-representative of usual sleep at home. Parental preference was for in-home (mat-based) testing, with 57% indicating a preference for this if it wereavailable vs. 7% preferring in-laboratory testing.
conclusionParent/carer reports regarding in-laboratory PSG experiences for their children with NDD suggest the test is associated with child worry and concerns that the sleep is not-representative of usual sleep at home. Consumer preference favours in-home sleep study testing over current in-laboratory diagnostic testing. CLINICAL
trial registrationThis study is part of a larger trial ACTRN12622001544763.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.