ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Robotic transmitral resection of floating left ventricular thrombus.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the role of surgery in the management of left ventricular (LV) thrombi remaining controversial, robotic LV thrombectomy has emerged as a viable treatment option. This study aimed to present our successful experience with a robotic mitral program, detailing the operative technique. We conducted a retrospective analysis of our institutional database to identify patients who underwent LV thrombectomy using the da Vinci robot system. Subsequently, serial echocardiograms and short- and long-term outcomes were reviewed and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Five patients (median age: 46 years) were included in this study. All patients presented with a floating LV thrombus and a history of embolization. Among them, four patients experienced reduced heart function, none had coronary artery disease, three experienced dilated cardiomyopathy. Complete resection was achieved in all cases, with no postoperative deaths, strokes, or major complications. In addition, LV function showed improvement during follow-up periods. Postoperative anticoagulation was continued for 2 years in one patient and 1 year in the remaining patients. No recurrence or further embolic events were observed during the median follow-up period of 6 years. Robotic LV thrombectomy yields excellent outcomes and should be considered early for patients with floating LV thrombi. However, further investigation is warranted to determine the optimal timing of this intervention and its role in the treatment paradigm, including whether these results can be extrapolated to patients with other forms of mobile thrombus and/or to support surgery as the primary prevention of systemic embolization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.