Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40272557›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2025

In-vitro effect of different instrumentations on adhesion of a multispecies bacterial mixture to root surfaces and the subsequent response of pulpal cells.

Alexandra Stähli, Sarah Feuz, Anja Elisabeth Jutzi, Luciana Pisenti Berto, Sandor Nietzsche, Anton Sculean, Sigrun Eick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandra StähliDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. alexandra.staehli@unibe.ch.
Sarah FeuzDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Anja Elisabeth JutziDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Luciana Pisenti BertoDepartment of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sandor NietzscheCenter for Electron Microscopy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Anton SculeanDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sigrun EickDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate in vitro the influence of instrumentation methods on the bacterial colonization of root dentine and pulpal cell behaviour seeded into the pulp cavum. MATERIALS AND

methodsExtracted teeth underwent root canal treatment with sealing of apices. The teeth were subjected to periodontal instrumentation using manual, ultrasonic scalers, air polishing, or left untreated. The root surfaces were then incubated with a mixture of six bacterial species for 2 h, 24 h and 10 weeks, before dentine samples were taken and analyzed for bacterial colony forming units (cfu) counts. In an additional series, pulpal cells were seeded into the reopened pulp chambers after 10 weeks of incubation with the bacterial mixture and analysed for interleukin (IL)-8 and matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-3 expression.

resultsAfter 2 and 24 h of incubation, instrumented dentine samples contained fewer bacteria than the controls (median (log10 cfu): 5.73 vs. 5.92; 7.71 vs. 8.01 (p = 0.007; p = 0.017)). At 24 h, among the instrumentation groups the highest cfu counts were observed in the ultrasonic group (p = 0.012 vs. manual scaler group; p = 0.002 vs. air polishing group). After 10 weeks, the number of viable bacteria (cfu) decreased in all groups with no difference between any group. Pulpal cells seeded in teeth, with or without prior instrumentation, but exposed to the bacterial mixture for 10 weeks, released higher levels of IL-8 and MMP-3 compared to those in uncontaminated and untreated controls.

conclusionsInstrumentation initially inhibits bacterial colonisation. Prolonged exposure of the outer root surface to bacteria may increase the inflammatory response of pulpal cells. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Regular removal of bacteria from the root surface is supported by these in vitro data.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionDental PulpDentinRoot Canal PreparationTooth RootBacterial LoadColony Count, MicrobialDental ScalingHumansInterleukin-8In Vitro TechniquesMatrix Metalloproteinase 3Interleukin-8Matrix Metalloproteinase 3Bacterial penetrationExposed root surfaceImmune response of pulpal cellsPeriodontal therapy

Identifiers

PMID40272557
PMCPMC12021972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.