Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40272554›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2025

Towards a good environmental status: a 4-year monitoring study on the contamination of the Bay of Luebeck with energetic compounds prior to munitions remediation.

Tobias H Bünning, Jennifer S Strehse, Edmund Maser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobias H BünningInstitute of Toxicology and Pharmacology for Natural Scientists, University Medical School Schleswig-Holstein, Brunswiker Str. 10, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Jennifer S StrehseInstitute of Toxicology and Pharmacology for Natural Scientists, University Medical School Schleswig-Holstein, Brunswiker Str. 10, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Edmund MaserInstitute of Toxicology and Pharmacology for Natural Scientists, University Medical School Schleswig-Holstein, Brunswiker Str. 10, 24105, Kiel, Germany. maser@toxi.uni-kiel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2405-142X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Bay of Luebeck, two out of several munition dumping areas in the German Baltic Sea are located, where approximately 65,000 t of munitions were dumped in the post-World War II period. The explosives used in these munitions, such as the nitroaromatic compound 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and its metabolic transformation products 4-amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene (4-ADNT) and 2-amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene, (2-ADNT) are considered mutagenic and carcinogenic and pose a potential threat to marine ecology and human health when they leak from corroding shells into the surrounding water. A 4-year pilot monitoring program, conducted in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment of Schleswig-Holstein, aimed to assess the current contamination level of the Bay of Luebeck's waters with various energetic compounds (EC) from dumped munitions and to evaluate the feasibility of integrating these investigations into the monthly routine sampling program of Schleswig-Holstein's coastal waters. This routine water sampling was expanded by direct monitoring of specific munition dumping sites in the Bay of Luebeck. Beyond repeated water samples, these specific dumping areas were long term monitored by using blue mussels and passive sampler systems which both are ideal approaches to infer whether these compounds are entering marine ecosystems such as in the Bay of Luebeck. In all water samples from the routine program collected monthly at four locations from the seabed and surface, TNT and six other EC were detected. However, only 1,3-dinitrobenzene (1,3-DNB), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT), and 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) were measured at average concentrations exceeding 1 ng/L. As expected, TNT water concentrations at the specific dumping arears were slightly higher (by a factor of 2-4) compared to the routine monitoring sites. At the same locations, EC were detected in a few individual blue mussel samples, with all concentrations remaining below 0.6 ng/g dry weight. EC concentrations in the passive samplers were in the one or two-digit nanogram range per passive sampler, except for 1,3-DNB which reached up to 105 ng per passive sampler. As a conclusion, over the course of the last 3 years, it became apparent that EC are ubiquitous distributed in the Bay of Luebeck, but their concentrations are still relatively low, even in both specific dumping areas.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringExplosive AgentsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsBaysEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationGermanyPilot ProjectsTrinitrotolueneExplosive AgentsTrinitrotolueneWater Pollutants, ChemicalBaltic SeaBlue musselsDumped munitionsEnergetic compoundsExplosivesMonitoring studyNitroaromaticsTrinitrotoluene

Identifiers

PMID40272554
PMCPMC12185565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.