ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Patient specific implants and instruments in orthopaedic trauma: 3D prints and implants in perlvic and hip fractures].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern pelvic surgery is essentially influenced by technological innovations. One of the most impressive advances in this field is the integration of 3D printing and the associated possibility for the production of 1:1 models of the pelvic skeleton. Using these models, conventional pelvic implants can preoperatively be more exactly and patient-specifically contoured. The use of this technology has the potential to substantially improve the quality of care and simultaneously to optimize the surgical results. By the use of 3D-printed implants, which are individually adapted to the anatomical conditions of the patient, operations can not only be carried out more quickly and efficiently but also with a greater accuracy and potentially fewer complications. This article presents two instructive cases. Case 1 demonstrates how a proximal femoral fracture with a pre-existing deformity of the femur can be treated with a patient-specific implant. Treatment with conventional intramedullary or extramedullary implants was not possible. Case 2 illustrates the treatment of a pelvic ring fracture and the advantage of 3D printing for the preoperative patient-specific contouring of conventional plate systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40272550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.