ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Screening ultrasound for deep vein thrombosis detection in high-risk pediatric trauma.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nursing management of deep vein thrombosis in children: a narrative review of challenges, evidence-based strategies, and systematic pathways.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review on the Approach to Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolism in Pediatric Trauma and Critically Ill ChildrenTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a rare but significant complication among high-risk pediatric trauma patients. The NO CLOT study's primary aim was to evaluate the safety of chemical prophylaxis against VTE in high-risk pediatric trauma patients with a secondary aim of evaluating the use of screening venous duplex ultrasound (sUS) to identify deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We hypothesized that sUS would detect asymptomatic DVT at a high rate in high-risk patients.
methodsA prospective multi-institutional study was performed at eight level one pediatric trauma centers from 2019 to 2022. sUS was recommended 7 days after admission for all high-risk trauma patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
resultsOf 460 high-risk trauma patients, 64/341 (18.8%) remained admitted on day 7 and underwent sUS. Ten of 64 (15.6%) had a DVT identified on sUS (median of 6.5 [IQR 5.2, 7.0] days after trauma). In 277 patients still admitted on day 7 without sUS performed, 15 (5.4%) developed symptomatic DVT (median of 6.0 [IQR 3.0, 8.0] days after trauma. For the sUS cohort, 9/10 (90%) DVTs were associated with an indwelling central venous line (CVL) and occurred either without chemical prophylaxis use at all in 4/10 (40%) or when initiated more than 24-h post-trauma in 6/10 (60%).
conclusionsIn this high-risk cohort, most DVTs were identified in the first week following injury; however, the majority were asymptomatic. Use of sUS at 1-week post-injury increases DVT detection; however, the clinical consequences of asymptomatic detection of DVT remain unknown. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40272548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.