ArticlePsychopharmacology2025
Oxiracetam ameliorates neurological function after traumatic brain injury through competing endogenous RNA regulatory network.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of L-oxiracetam on cognitive function in patients with traumatic brain injury: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Trial
- Therapeutic Potential of Oxiracetam in Neurocognitive Disorders: A Narrative Review.Brain and behavior · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleOxiracetam (ORC) has been demonstrated to improve neurological function resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI).
objectivesThis study aims to explore the precise molecular mechanism of ORC in the treatment of TBI.
methodsTBI rat model was established and treated with ORC. Modified Garcia score, rotarod test and HE staining were employed to evaluate the neuroprotective effects of ORC. Subsequently, RNA-seq was conducted on the hippocampus of sham, TBI and ORC rats to identify differential expression (DE) lncRNAs and mRNAs. Functional analysis of DE lncRNAs and mRNAs was performed. The real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to determine the expression of DE lncRNAs and DE mRNAs. Western blot was performed to explore important pathway in ceRNA networks.
resultsORC has been demonstrated to effectively improve neurological function in TBI rats. A total of 10 ORC-treated DE lncRNAs and 61 DE mRNAs were obtained. A co-expression network comprising 79 lncRNA-mRNA pairs associated with the treatment of ORC was constructed. Furthermore, an lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulated ceRNA network was constructed, comprising 15 mRNAs, 41 miRNAs and 10 lncRNAs. Functional enrichment, qRT-PCR, and Western blot analysis showed that ORC improve neurological function of TBI rats by regulating multiple signaling pathways, including the JAK-STAT/PI3K-Akt pathway, as well as affecting the expression of key genes Prlr, Cdkn1a, and Cldn1.
conclusionOur study reveals the mechanism of ORC therapy in TBI rats, which mainly relies on the regulation of the JAK-STAT/PI3K-Akt pathway and the influence on the expression of key genes Prlr, Cdkn1a, and Cldn1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40272502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.