Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40272489›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Reduction of biopsy rate in BI-RADS4 breast lesions: potential of an abbreviated advanced DWI protocol.

Mariko Goto, Denis Le Bihan, Koji Sakai, Kei Yamada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariko GotoDepartment of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. gomari@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-3201
Denis Le BihanDepartment of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Koji SakaiDepartment of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kei YamadaDepartment of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP23K07211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study compared the diagnostic performance of diffusion biomarkers estimated from an abbreviated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocol and assessed their potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies of benign BI-RADS 4 lesions identified on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted from 2019 to 2023. All patients underwent abbreviated DWI at 3 T with four b-values (0 s/mm

resultsIn total, 168 female patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 56.2 ± 13.5 years) with 178 BI-RADS 4 lesions on DCE MRI were analyzed. The median ADC

conclusionDiffusion MRI biomarkers obtained using an abbreviated DWI protocol reduced unnecessary biopsies in BI-RADS 4 lesions, with K performing slightly better than ADC. KEY POINTS: Question MRI BI-RADS category 4 includes a substantial number of benign lesions, and reducing unnecessary biopsies remains a critical clinical concern. Findings The parameters from abbreviated DWI show lesion differentiation comparable to ADC and have greater potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Clinical relevance This study underscores the potential of imaging biomarkers from abbreviated DWI for assessing breast MRI BI-RADS 4 lesions. These biomarkers may be comparable or superior to standard ADC in reducing unnecessary biopsies and could aid in improving patient management decisions.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedBiopsyBreastContrast MediaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnnecessary ProceduresContrast MediaBiopsyBreast neoplasmsDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingSensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.