ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2025
[Vasoactive agents in septic shock-individualized strategies].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy of milrinone combined with norepinephrine in improving hemodynamics and protecting liver/kidney function in patients with septic shock.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemodynamic stabilization and preservation of organ perfusion are central elements in the management of septic shock. This is achieved by fluid resuscitation and by administration of vasoactive agents. Current guidelines recommend norepinephrine as the first-line vasoactive substance. In cases of high norepinephrine requirements the addition of nonadrenergic vasopressors is recommended. Furthermore, evidence suggests that early use of complementary vasoactive substances may provide additional benefits. Such a regimen, in terms of a broad-spectrum vasopressor approach, appears physiologically plausible. Post hoc analyses of studies investigating vasopressin or angiotensin II also suggest that specific subphenotypes may particularly benefit from individual vasoactive agents. Adjunctive therapy with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone can improve vasopressor responsiveness and reduce mortality. In cases of cardiac dysfunction, a trial with dobutamine or a switch from norepinephrine to epinephrine is recommended. To enhance inodilator effects, milrinone or levosimendan may represent additional therapeutic options for certain patients. Although short-acting beta-blockers are not part of the standard treatment for septic shock, they may, in selected cases, contribute to hemodynamic improvement in patients with inadequately high sinus tachycardia or atrial tachyarrhythmias. Based on pathophysiological considerations and the currently available evidence, targeted use of specific vasoactive substances in defined subphenotypes may be justified. An initial broad-spectrum vasopressor strategy incorporating biomarkers such as renin and patient-specific characteristics followed by a focused de-escalation approach could represent a promising concept. However, the effectiveness of these strategies requires further investigation in randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.