ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Motion Misperception in Anisomyopia Before and After Optical Correction.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Changing Natural History of Anisometropia: A Scoping Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate interocular delay in anisomyopes at different spatial frequencies. Methods: Interocular delay (difference in processing speeds between eyes) was measured psychophysically in 21 anisomyopes (observers with a large refractive difference), 20 isomyopes, and 19 emmetropes at 0.5, 1, and 2 cycles per degree (c/deg). During the visual task, small Gabor elements with lateral movements were shown to both eyes. When interocular delay was present, the stimuli created an illusory percept of a cylinder rotating in depth (motion misperception) despite no depth cues. Anisomyopes and isomyopes were tested before and after optical correction; emmetropes were tested only before. Clinical differences between eyes in anisomyopes, including axial length, visual acuity, and spherical equivalent, were also measured. Results: Anisomyopes showed interocular delay at 2 c/deg, with the more myopic eye faster before optical correction (Cohen's d = 0.48), correlating with clinical differences (P < 0.05). Optical correction abolished this delay at 2 c/deg. At 0.5 and 1 c/deg, anisomyopes showed no delay before optical correction, although there were spatial differences between the eyes. Surprisingly, they showed interocular delay after optical correction (more myopic eye faster) when the images of both eyes were spatially equal (P < 0.05). Isomyopes and emmetropes showed no interocular delay at any spatial frequency before and after optical correction. Conclusions: Anisomyopes experience motion misperception at 2 c/deg before optical correction and at 0.5 and 1 c/deg after correction, suggesting optical and neural origins of interocular delay. Tailored interventions based on clinical characteristics may help improve visual function such as motion perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.