Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40272204›Full record

Trial reportBehavioural pharmacology2025

Gabapentin and D-cycloserine alone and in combination with naloxone in methadone-maintained humans responding under a naloxone novel-response discrimination procedure.

Lauren R Fitzgerald, Nichole C Stanley, Joseph B Guise, Christopher S Cargile, Michael J Mancino, Alison H Oliveto

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavioural pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren R FitzgeraldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Nichole C StanleyArkansas Center for Health Improvement, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Joseph B GuiseDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Christopher S CargileDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Michael J MancinoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Alison H OlivetoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Funding

Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasUL1TR003107 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2019 to 2023
$21.6M
OPIOID ANTAGONIST DISCRIMINATION--A MODEL OF WITHDRAWALR01DA010017 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI OLIVETO, ALISON · 1997 to 2011
$1.8M
J. NRSA TrainingTL1TR003109 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI SEXTON, KEVIN WAYNE · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR003109NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003107NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA010017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study examined the impact of the N-type calcium channel blocker gabapentin (GBP) and the partial glycine agonist D-cycloserine (CYC) to attenuate the behavioral effects of naloxone in opioid-dependent humans responding under a naloxone discrimination procedure. Methadone-maintained participants were trained to distinguish between a low dose of naloxone (0.15 mg/70 kg, i.m.; i.e., drug A) and placebo (i.e. drug B) under an instructed novel-response drug discrimination procedure, in which participants identify the drug condition as 'A', 'B', or 'N' (neither A nor B - 'novel'). Once the discrimination was acquired, doses of CYC (0, 500, and 625 mg) and GBP (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg) each alone and in combination with the training dose of naloxone were tested. GBP alone produced only placebo-appropriate responding and did not significantly alter naloxone discrimination when coadministered with naloxone, though it modestly reduced naloxone-induced visual analog scale ratings of drug 'strength'. CYC alone also produced predominantly placebo-appropriate responding and did not modulate naloxone-appropriate responding, but increased ratings of bad effects and decreased ratings of like placebo relative to naloxone alone at the 500 mg dose. These null findings regarding the modulation of naloxone discrimination highlight the limited efficacy of GBP and CYC in this context, contributing to the understanding of pharmacological interactions with opioid antagonists and their potential implications for opioid withdrawal treatment.

Indexed as

AminesCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsCycloserinegamma-Aminobutyric AcidMethadoneNaloxoneOpioid-Related DisordersAdultDiscrimination, PsychologicalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGabapentinHumansMaleAminesCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsCycloserineGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidMethadoneNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsD-cycloserinedrug discriminationgabapentinhumansnaloxone

Identifiers

PMID40272204
PMCPMC12226226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.