Trial reportBehavioural pharmacology2025
Gabapentin and D-cycloserine alone and in combination with naloxone in methadone-maintained humans responding under a naloxone novel-response discrimination procedure.
Trial report in Behavioural pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study examined the impact of the N-type calcium channel blocker gabapentin (GBP) and the partial glycine agonist D-cycloserine (CYC) to attenuate the behavioral effects of naloxone in opioid-dependent humans responding under a naloxone discrimination procedure. Methadone-maintained participants were trained to distinguish between a low dose of naloxone (0.15 mg/70 kg, i.m.; i.e., drug A) and placebo (i.e. drug B) under an instructed novel-response drug discrimination procedure, in which participants identify the drug condition as 'A', 'B', or 'N' (neither A nor B - 'novel'). Once the discrimination was acquired, doses of CYC (0, 500, and 625 mg) and GBP (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg) each alone and in combination with the training dose of naloxone were tested. GBP alone produced only placebo-appropriate responding and did not significantly alter naloxone discrimination when coadministered with naloxone, though it modestly reduced naloxone-induced visual analog scale ratings of drug 'strength'. CYC alone also produced predominantly placebo-appropriate responding and did not modulate naloxone-appropriate responding, but increased ratings of bad effects and decreased ratings of like placebo relative to naloxone alone at the 500 mg dose. These null findings regarding the modulation of naloxone discrimination highlight the limited efficacy of GBP and CYC in this context, contributing to the understanding of pharmacological interactions with opioid antagonists and their potential implications for opioid withdrawal treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.