ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
Multi-year comparison of VITEK MS performance for identification of rarely encountered pathogenic gram-positive organisms (GPOs) in a large integrated Canadian healthcare region.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of Pathogens by a Novel User-Developed Broad-Range BR 16S PCR rRNA Polymerase Chain Reaction/Gene Sequencing Assay: Multiyear Experience in a Large Canadian Healthcare Zone.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- A dual-phase strategy to integrate the VITEK MS RUO database into routine clinical practice: from validation of analytical performance to implementation of an automated workflow.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This multi-year study (2014-2019) compared identification of rare and unusual gram-positive organisms (GPOs) by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (VITEK MS; bioMérieux, Laval, Quebec) to 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16S) according to our laboratory routine workflow. 16S is done if initial MALDI-TOF MS results are discordant or wrong, or there are no results. GPO isolates were first analyzed by standard phenotypic methods and MALDI-TOF MS using direct deposit with full formic acid extraction; MALDI-TOF was repeated if no result occurred. Medically approved 16S analyses were done using fast protocols. Isolate sequences were analyzed using the Integrated Database Network System bacterial database (SmartGene, Lausanne, Switzerland). 655 GPO isolates were recovered from 648 specimens; >1 isolate was recovered from 7 (1%). A total of 451 (68.9%) aerobic gram-positive bacilli (GPBs) and 204 (31.1%) aerobic gram-positive cocci (GPCs) were mainly recovered from bloodstream infections (35%), sterile fluids and deep tissues (35%), and abscesses/deep wounds (17%). Accurate genus vs species identities were obtained for 59% and 49.4% GPB, and 81% and 53.9% GPC, respectively. Wrong or no results were obtained for 9% and 31% of GPB and 7% and 12% of GPC; 15% of GPBs and 5.3% of GPC identification errors occurred due to absence from the instrument's database. VITEK MS performance remained stable for GPB and GPC isolates due to few species additions to the database. VITEK MS databases need to be continually updated to include an increasing number of rare and unusual GPOs causing invasive human infections. 16S remains important for identification of GPOs where MALDI-TOF fails.IMPORTANCEMALDI-TOF MS has transformed the identification of commonly encountered GPOs in the clinical laboratory, but rare and unusual bacteria continue to challenge the technology. This study verified the performance of VITEK MS for identification of a broad range of rare and unusual clinical GPO isolates by our large reference laboratory workflow over a multi-year period. Although most GPOs were accurately identified by MALDI-TOF MS, a small number of common GPC isolates (6.3%) (i.e.,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.