ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2025
Outcomes of Eye Examination and Vision Screening in Term Infants Presenting to a Tertiary Hospital in Türkiye.
Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The global prevalence of horizontal strabismus: A systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on ethnic variation.Survey of ophthalmologyPooled it
- Acute Retinal Necrosis in an Infant With Corneal and Macular Scarring.Journal of vitreoretinal diseases · 2026Article
- The global prevalence of horizontal strabismus: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on ethnic variation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Ophthalmic screening is an important part of the medical care of children as some eye abnormalities can lead to irreversible vision loss if not treated in the first few months or years of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of the ophthalmic screening program in term infants aged ≤1 year who presented to a tertiary hospital in Türkiye. Materials and Methods: The records of 1,035 infants ≤1 year old who underwent ophthalmic screening between November 2019 and February 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic and medical details, parental complaints about the infants' eyes, family history of ocular, adnexal, and systemic pathologies, light reactions, red reflex test results, eye movements, blink response to light, fixation and following, noticeable strabismus, conjunctivitis, epiphora, anterior segment and fundus pathologies, and treatments applied were recorded. The referring physician (family physician, pediatrician) and reason for reference were also noted. Results: Abnormal ophthalmological findings were detected in 136 infants (13.14%). The most common finding was congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (72.05%), followed by strabismus (8.82%), ptosis (4,41%), absence of following (3.67%), congenital cataract (2.94%), hemangioma of the adnexa (2.94%), nystagmus (2.94%), albino fundus (1.47%), preretinal hemorrhage (1.47%), and coloboma of the iris and choroid (1.47%). We detected abnormal red reflex in 4 infants who were not referred for red reflex abnormality by the referring physician, while another 4 infants referred for red reflex abnormality had no pathology on ocular examinations including the red reflex test. Conclusion: The importance of ophthalmic screening in infants is well appreciated but there are inadequacies in performing and interpreting the red reflex test among family physicians and pediatricians. Efforts should be directed at improving vision screening skills, especially red reflex testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.