ReviewThe FEBS journal2025
Transcription-coupled repair: tangled up in convoluted repair.
Review in The FEBS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- ERCC6 at the Transcription-Replication Interface: Integration of Transcription-Coupled Repair with Replication Stress Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Molecular insights into DNA damage response plasticity in glioma stem cells.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair protects against genomic instability and cell death induced by the liver toxin methyleugenol.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- PARP1 and PARylation facilitate transcription-coupled DNA repair by stabilizing the CSB-RNAPII complex.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Transcription-Coupled Nucleotide Excision Repair: A Faster Solution or the Only Option?Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Mechanisms of DNA repair and mutagenesis induced by acetaldehyde, acrolein, aristolochic acids, and vinyl chloride.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significant progress has been made in understanding the mechanism of transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair (TC-NER); however, numerous aspects remain elusive, including TC-NER regulation, lesion-specific and cell type-specific complex composition, structural insights, and lesion removal dynamics in living cells. This review summarizes and discusses recent advancements in TC-NER, focusing on newly identified interactors, mechanistic insights from cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) studies and live cell imaging, and the contribution of post-translational modifications (PTMs), such as ubiquitin, in regulating TC-NER. Furthermore, we elaborate on the consequences of TC-NER deficiencies and address the role of accumulated damage and persistent lesion-stalled RNA polymerase II (Pol II) as major drivers of the disease phenotype of Cockayne syndrome (CS) and its related disorders. In this context, we also discuss the severe effects of transcription-blocking lesions (TBLs) on neurons, highlighting their susceptibility to damage. Lastly, we explore the potential of investigating three-dimensional (3D) chromatin structure and phase separation to uncover further insights into this essential DNA repair pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.